| Tuesday
October 19th |
|
West Brom 0
|
QPR 1
|
| |
|
|
|
S.Wardley |
The report
below is written by Dave Thomas.
It was some
game, this - heart-stopping drama from beginning to end. The relief
at the final whistle was audible - for we survived, somehow, a
second-half onslaught that saw a dozen chances go begging for
West Brom. But don't get the idea we were lucky. We were anything
but, and the win was thoroughly deserved.
It was a game
of huge contrasts. One minute Rangers were purring, passing the
ball with a fluency and speed that had West Brom chasing shadows;
the next we were hanging on like a non-league team 1-0 against
higher opposition in a cup-tie, defending for dear life, booting
the ball wherever we could clear it, and watching hearts in mouth
as it went thankfully six inches past our upright.
For their
part, West Brom alternated between average and dreadful. They
were without doubt the worst team we have played this season,
and their confidence rating, especially in the first-half, was
nil.
It may seem
a contradiction in terms to describe any team which makes a dozen
chances in a game as average at best, but that's what they were.
Rangers started
the game brimful of confidence - backed by a massive Rangers turn-out
for a midweek game away from home. There were certainly in excess
of a thousand, and we easily outsung the home crowd, who could
just as easily have been on a sponsored silence for all the noise
they made.
Rangers lined
up with Harper in goal; (left to right) Darlington, Maddix, Baraclough,
Ready and Breacker at the back; Peacock, Langley and Wardley in
midfield; with Kiwomya and Steiner up front; the same team, in
fact, as at Ipswich. The first-half was all Rangers. When we passed
the ball around well, it was just like old times. As so often,
it was the final ball into the box that was our downfall, Breacker
the main culprit.
All the same,
we did to West Brom for most of the fourty-five what Ipswich had
done to us for the first twenty-five on Saturday... only without
a goal to show for our efforts. A placed header across the face
of the goal, and a shot and turn, both from Steiner, were our
two best chances, although our closing down and general committment
meant we enjoyed by far the greater possession and attacking ideas.
West Brom,
missing Lee Hughes, posed little threat and the Rangers defence
coped well enough with what very little threat West Brom posed.
Gerry's myopia was again in evidence tonight. Fine signing that
he is, enthusiastic and willing, Jermaine Darlington is no left-back.
Nor for that matter is Tim Breacker a wing-back. And nor can he
take a corner. After two poor corners (notable for the elaborate
way he signalled his intent - worked out on the training ground
no doubt), Breacker lost his cool, and a bad tackle on Andy McDermott
looked like earning him a red card. Earlier he had been booked
for taking too long over a throw-in. The referee, though, in keeping
with his inconsistency all night, let him off with a word.
At this point,
it would have made sense to haul off Breacker, put Darlington
on the right, where he would have been more comfortable anyway,
and stick on Rowland, who for all his limitations is at least
naturally left-footed. As it was, Gerry did nothing. West Brom
then spent the second 45 minutes attacking down their right, our
left and against a clearly out of his depth Darlington.
Another thing
that niggles me, and is beginning to niggle others if the noises
around me were anything to go by, is throw-ins. We are truly dreadful
at them, no-one moving, the thrower having no idea what to do
with it - and more often than not handing the advantage to our
opponents from them. Do they work on them on the training ground?
It doesn't seem the case. Perhaps more time spent working on some
movement at throw-ins and less time teaching complicated corner
signals which bear little relation to the way the ball is finally
delivered, might be a good idea, Gerry.
West Brom
kept us pinned back for the first few minutes of the second-half
and an equaliser looked on the cards. In fact, it was against
the run of play that Rangers took the lead. Credit where it's
due, it was Breacker who made it, putting over an inch-perfect
cross from the by-line on the right when it appeared he had over-run
it, and Wardley placed his header low into the corner of the net.
A well-worked goal.
It's hard
to convey the drama of the last half an hour: desperate defending
and West Brom creating (all from the right, with Richard Sneekes
again their most influential player) at least a dozen clear-cut
chances. But when Harper wasn't saving us, a defender's boot or
head would; and when a defender's boot or head couldn't get in
the way, wayward shooting would see the ball flash past the post
or over the bar.
It's been
a long time since we've been only 1-0 up away from home. At Ipswich,
and before then at Bradford and Crewe last year, we were comfortably
in control. But tonight was different, Tonight we were hanging
on for all our worth. The tension was unbelievable, and broken
only twice when hitting them on the break - firstly Kiwomya going
close, and then Wardley even closer still, his powerful shot hitting
the post and rebounding to safety. But, somehow, miraculously,
we hung on. Had West Brom had Lee Hughes it might have been a
different story. But they didn't. The points were ours - and thoroughly
deserved for a battling performance.
Ready, his
propensity to foul just a little too often for comfort apart,
Langley, his intelligent passing again a factor, Peacock, before
he limped off injured to be replaced by Murray for the last 20
minutes, and Steiner, unorthodox but strangely effective, all
stood out for Rangers.
On another
night Chris Kiwomya, not always effective but tonight hard-working
and hard-running, would have won man of the match. But that accolade
went to Ian Baraclough, who was simply outstanding and didn't
put a foot wrong the whole game.